Demystifying Change Management

Some time ago, I was at a dinner party and someone I had just met asked me what I do.  So I began with my usual spiel:

“I help people adapt to and accept the change they experience as employees.”

“Hmm” she said, looking puzzled.  “What does that mean?”

I smiled, appreciating her curiosity.  “Well, organizations go through changes and employees feel the impact of those changes.  Change can involve anything from having to adjust to and accept a new leader and leadership style to a technology change that impacts the work process, to a merger with another company and the resulting layoffs, and so on.”

“Been there, done that,” she offered.

“My role in all this is to help make it easier for employees to adjust to and accept change, which usually ensures that the change is successful for the organization.”

Normally, this response would prompt the listener to subtly change the subject to something else, like the weather, but in this particular case I received more questions.

“Wow – that’s interesting.  So you kind of help people cope with change.  I could have used that at my last job!  But what do you actually do?”

“Part of what I do involves ensuring that employees understand exactly what the change will be, why the change is happening, and what’s in it for them.  The bulk of what I do involves gaining insight into how that change will introduce discomfort into the lives of those affected by it and coming up with ways to reduce that discomfort so that people are more likely to adapt to and accept the change.”

“Oh, I see.”  Her face lit up.  “So, good communication seems key.”

“Yes, keeping employees informed about what is coming, why it’s coming, what’s in it for them and steps they can take to make the change easier to deal with is important and essential – but it’s insufficient to help people adapt to change, and accept their new situation.”

She thought for a moment, and then said, “Hmm…I always thought Change Management was about communication.  Come to think of it, I liked knowing what was going on, but I can’t say knowing made it that much easier to accept the change.”

“I agree.  Knowing about change doesn’t necessarily make it easier to accept.  That’s why the bigger part of what I do is focused on discovering gaps, which provides insight into why people are not likely to adapt to and accept change.  This leads to methods of closing those gaps.”

“So what’s this field called?”

“It’s called Change Management.  Have you heard of it?”

“Yes I have…at my workplace.  So, if Change Management is more than just ensuring better communication about change, what does it involve?”

Step 1: Know your Stakeholders

“Change Management can be defined as a set of related activities involving the group of people being affected by the change – these people are called stakeholders.  Stakeholders can be divided into subgroups based on the extent to which they will be affected by the implementation and success or failure of the change initiative.”

“Makes sense that you should know your affected groups first” she said.  I nodded and continued.

“Once the stakeholders have been identified and grouped, the second step involves identifying gaps for each stakeholder group, between the way things work now, called current state and the way we want them to work, called future state.”

Suddenly, in a British accent, she said “So you have to Mind the Gaps,” emphasizing the last three words as she gestured quotes.  I recognized that she was referring to the audio warning at subway stations in London that tell you to ‘Mind the Gap’ as you board the train.

“You’re absolutely right!  Mind the Gaps!”  I exclaimed laughing.

“Third, we determine the best solution(s) to help close the gaps.”

“Close the Gaps!” she asserted.

“Yup!”  I smiled.  “Fourth, we manage implementing those solutions to make adoption and acceptance of change easier.”

“Cross over to the future state?” she offered.

“You’ve got it!”  I liked how she was following along.

She looked at me thoughtfully and counting on her fingers she said “So…first, know your stakeholders, second, mind the gaps, third, close the gaps and fourth, cross over to the future state.”  She smiled, seeming proud of having grasped the four general steps of the Change Management process.

“Nice!” I said smiling and feeling like we had reached that point in the conversation when she would change the topic to something else.

She interrupted the pause and with an expression of concern said, “I don’t know many people who like change.  What if leadership decides change is necessary, but people don’t like the nature of the change, for example, they don’t like the specific software that is chosen to replace an older one?”

“Good question.  After leadership has decided that change is necessary, it’s very important that they engage the stakeholders who will be most affected to determine how the change will be implemented.  In your example, they would engage stakeholders in determining which software is best to replace the old one.”

“That makes sense” she said, thoughtfully.  “I worked in a company where they skipped this step and experienced morale issues and employees quitting their jobs.”

Steps 2 & 3: Mind and Close the Gaps

“Well, the term ‘gap’ is used to express the difference between the current state and future state.  Minding the gaps involves first defining the current and future states in a structured manner, then comparing the two states to find differences or gaps.  A thorough gap analysis leads to identifying strategies that can help close the gaps and then cross over to the future state.”

I could tell she was processing what I had said.  “Which do you define first, the future state or current state?  Seems like you’d want to know how things are now before you decide how you want them to be.”

I looked at her and smiled, appreciating her critical thinking.  “You know, you should be in my field.  You ask such thoughtful questions – I know you’d be good at this.”

She smiled back and I continued.  “The short answer is that there is no hard and fast rule.  Whether you start with future state, current state, or consider them side by side depends on the nature of the gap you’re trying to assess and the organizational circumstances.  Whenever I can, however, I start the gap assessments with the end in mind.”

“Why?”  She probed.

I think it was Steven Covey who, in his book ‘Seven Habits of Highly Effective People’, wrote ‘Start with the end in mind.’  I’ve discovered a lot of benefit to adopting that philosophy in Change Management.  Leadership has already defined the future state to some extent by the time the organization begins trying to achieve it.  Part of Change Management involves helping stakeholders further define that vision and its benefits in their context.  The expectations, hope and excitement that come from imagining a better future can fuel the process of defining the current state, minding the gaps, closing the gaps, and crossing over to the future state.”

I paused again.  She said “So exploring what the future state means in their context defines what’s in it for them.  This must give people a reason to participate in ensuring the success of a change initiative.  Am I right?”

“You’re absolutely correct!  I exclaimed.

“Very interesting…”  She trailed off in thought, then said “So back to gaps…tell me more.”

“Gaps can exist in up to five aspects of change, depending on the situation.  If you look for these five types of gaps then you know you’ve identified a comprehensive set of gaps.”

“Five gaps only huh?” She said cheekily with a smile.   “Sounds like you’ve really thought this through!”

I was caught off guard “Well…I…”

She rescued me with “I’m kidding!  So tell me the five gaps.”

“Ok, let’s use an example to illustrate as I explain.  Imagine that the company you work for told your team that starting next year, you will be using a new software system to track inventory.”

“Ok – got it” she said, looking amused.

Alignment Gaps

“In their research, Leadership may have discovered that the trend in the industry is to use cloud-based software-as-a-service for managing inventory and decided to replace their legacy system, which they believed to be slow and clunky.”

“So, one potential gap in this example is between your leadership’s vision of the future state and its benefits and what your team understands about how they will benefit from adopting the future state.  This is called an Alignment Gap, because key stakeholder perceptions are not aligned with the leadership stakeholder vision.”

“How do you know how wide this gap in alignment is?” She asked.

“The Change Management consultant needs to spend time learning the Leadership perspective and what key stakeholders who will be affected by the change understand about it.  In our example, one way to accomplish this is to ask the stakeholders what they like and dislike about their current software and what they know about the benefits the future state software will provide.”

“What the consultant learns from this step can be used in a subsequent dialogue with key stakeholders to close the Alignment Gap.  For example, if performing queries and generating reports is a manual and laborious task in the current state software, and this task will be easier in the future state software, this knowledge can be used in the dialogue with stakeholders to highlight what’s in it for them to buy into the future state.  Another important step in closing the alignment gap is to engage stakeholders in gathering requirements for and in selecting the specific software-as-a-service to replace the legacy system. Stakeholders will select software that will eliminate many of the pain points they experience with the current software, thus establishing the answer to ‘what’s-in-it-for-me?’”

I paused, searching her face for signs of boredom, thinking I was getting too much in the weeds.  “Go on.” she said surprising me with her level of interest.

User-experience Gaps

“The second type of gap is that between the current state and future state, in terms of user experience.  The gaps or differences between these states can point to ways in which the new process or software needs to be configured or customized to make the user’s experience more engaging.  These gaps are called User-Experience Gaps.”

“For example, in the current state, your inventory process may involve manual activities like handling paper purchase orders, making phone calls to verify orders before entering them in the system and creating reports.  In the future state, all tasks might be done in the software, eliminating the manual tasks involved in the current state and eliminating the need to speak directly with vendors.  The new software may also show reports in ways that employees are not accustomed to.”

“While on the surface the future state looks better from an efficiency standpoint, for the people doing the job, it may feel sterile and lacking in human contact, because people may enjoy talking with vendors.  This could make the change more difficult to adopt and accept.”

“As the person responsible for reconciling orders with inventory, you need to know and feel comfortable that the future state software will handle the uniqueness of your work process while making your job easier.  A comparison of current and future state processes can be followed by questions like, what aspects of the current process need to be retained.  Why?  How important are the unique aspects of the current process?  These questions help identify general User Experience Gaps.  This kind of user experience gap analysis is the starting point for technical requirements gathering, which involves determining how the new software needs to be configured or customized to deliver the desired future state.”

I paused again wondering if I was making sense and said “You haven’t touched your Tiramisu,” longing to dig into mine, as it is my favorite Italian dessert.

She didn’t say anything, but picked up her spoon, took a bite of her dessert, and looked distant, as if in deep thought.

She seemed to be processing what I had said about alignment gaps and user experience gaps.  I wondered what she was thinking and attempted to break the silence with “Yup.  I know…it’s deep stuff!”

She didn’t seem to hear me, and after a little thought, she said “So the process of identifying user experience gaps must set up expectations in the minds of stakeholders.”

I must have startled her with my responses, because she stepped back a little.

“Precisely!”  I exclaimed, impressed with her insight.  “That’s the double-edged sword!  If you bother to ask stakeholders for input about how to improve their process for handling inventory, you set up expectations that the process will be improved in accordance with that input.  However, not all inputs can be accommodated, so if expectations are not managed, your adoption and acceptance of the change are at risk.  In many IT projects, inadequate effort to manage expectations, which are set up by engaging stakeholders to understand user experience gaps, is a fundamental reason for poor adoption and acceptance of change.”

She seemed to detect the passion in my voice and said with a smile, “Now that’s deep dude.”  I got the sense she might be making fun of me, but she smiled, so I continued.

“Once user experience gaps are understood and technical requirements have been gathered, a decision may be made to deliver only a subset of the technical requirements.  In this situation stakeholder expectations will have to be managed.  Stakeholders will have to be shepherded through accepting that some requirements cannot be met and through accepting the methods for closing these gaps.”

“Ok, so how do you manage expectations?”

Requirement Fulfillment Gaps

“Well, the first step is to list user requirements that cannot be fulfilled.  These are the third type of gaps called Requirement Fulfillment Gaps.  We manage expectations by closing these gaps.  Each gap can be closed either with a work-around or with the addition of resources.  In either case, there is a potential for encountering knowledge and skill gaps in existing employees who have to do work-arounds or new employees who have to be trained to do the work.”

Knowledge and Skill Gaps

Knowledge and Skill Gaps are the fourth type of gaps.  They point to what people need to know and the skills they need to possess to succeed in the future state.  An analysis of these gaps can determine how they can be closed, either through training, job aids and/or coaching.”

Proficiency Gaps

“Training, job aids and coaching can only close the knowledge and skill gaps.  Knowledge and skill gaps usually result in the fifth type of gap, a Proficiency Gap. This is a gap between the level of desired performance and the current level of performance on a specific task or job.  In order to determine where proficiency gaps are, it is necessary to determine performance metrics, goals and methods of monitoring and measuring performance.”

“So closing the knowledge, skill and proficiency gaps is the key to adoption?” She asked.

“Good question…let me refill your drink and I’ll tell you.”  I took her wine glass and headed to the drink table, looking back, as if to reassure her that I would be back.

As I turned around to walk back to my new friend, I saw someone else about to engage her in conversation so I rushed back and said “Here you are!  Now, where were we?”

She turned and smiled seeing her wine glass refilled and said “Hmm…you had just finished describing the alignment, user experience, requirements, knowledge, skills and proficiency gaps you encounter in Change Management and how to close them.  Then I asked whether closing the knowledge, skill and proficiency gaps is the key to adoption.”

Step 4: Cross Over to the Future State

“Ah – right!”  I was happy she was tracking.

“Not quite, while closing these gaps is necessary, it is not sufficient.  The key to adoption is that the work must be positively reinforcing.  Positive reinforcement can come from different aspects of doing a job.  One source can be the workers themselves.  This kind of positive reinforcement is also called self-reinforcement, because, simply put, workers like what they do.”

“Well, I’m paid for what I do and I LOVE it!” She interrupted.  I forced a smile and continued with what I felt was a very important point regarding achieving adoption and acceptance.

“A second source of positive reinforcement is the job itself.  If the job is made easier than it used to be, that difference in user experience is positively reinforcing, and can sustain desirable performance indefinitely.”

“Many technology changes are very dependent on this kind of positive reinforcement.  In the example we used before, if doing inventory management is hassle free (requires less phone calls), involves handling less paperwork (avoid losing invoices etc.) and takes less time (so you feel more productive), wouldn’t you enjoy your job more?”

“Yes, but earlier you alluded to people liking phone conversations with vendors.”

“Good catch!  Yes, sometimes over-engineering a job can remove positive reinforcers from the job, like human contact.  However, there are ways around this, which a good Change Management consultant can find.“

“Positive reinforcement that is engineered into the job is extremely powerful and should be leveraged whenever it can be, because over time, it pays dividends, can cost less to administer than the third source of positive reinforcement, and is generally sufficient to maintain high levels of performance indefinitely, all other things being equal.  But not all kinds of work can be engineered to yield positive reinforcement, so a third source of positive reinforcement needs to be used.  This third source is the supervisor who is held accountable for production and quality.“

“The supervisor passes his or her accountability on to employees.  In some cases, the supervisor operates in a way that establishes an unspoken threat to employees – Do it or else…  The enlightened supervisor, on the other hand, passes on accountability in the form of recognition and rewards for improving performance and for maintaining proficient performance.”

“When positive reinforcement is dependent on performance, it’s called performance-based positive reinforcement.  Many organizations today train their management teams to recognize and reward performance improvement and proficient performance.  Performance-based positive reinforcement relies on objective measurement and consistency to be effective.”

Once a method of monitoring and measuring performance is designed, a system of rewards and recognition needs to be attached to performance improvement and goal attainment to facilitate reaching and maintaining proficiency.”

Suffice it to say, regardless of which type of positive reinforcement is experienced by employees, it is always more effective in generating discretionary effort than threat-based management.”

” So that’s it.” I said, summarizing, “Know your stakeholders, mind the gaps, close the gaps and cross over to the future state!”

“Yup” She replied.  “And to close gaps, get people to understand what’s in it for them to adopt and accept change; Gather an understanding of what they need in their journey towards adoption and acceptance; Manage expectations along the way; Monitor what requirements cannot be fulfilled and devise work-arounds and/or resource solutions to close those gaps; Identify and close knowledge and skill gaps and implement a proficiency improvement plan with positive reinforcement.  That’s all!”

I was impressed with how well she had listened and retained what I had said.  Having run out of steam, I said “so we haven’t really talked about what you do…”

She smiled and interrupted me, “Yes we have.  I’m a Change Management Consultant.”  With that, my new friend walked towards the table for some coffee, looking back and smiling as she proceeded.


Copyright 2016 by Andrew Shamrao, All Rights Reserved


I would like to thank the following individuals for providing feedback on earlier drafts of this article:  Mahnoor Shamrao, Lisa Heil, Dan Jarmel, Ruth Grouell, Craig LaFargue, Katrina Twaddell, Travis Peterson, Nick Raad, and Jur Strobos.

Vote! – Your way of life and how you run your business could depend on it.

By Andrew Shamrao

While I’ve decided to vote for Hillary Clinton already, because she’s a woman and therefore, a sign of inclusion and (hopefully) a good role model for my daughter, I was hoping Clinton would have convinced me by the final debate that she’s a presidential candidate worth considering.  She didn’t.

I still see that she has an opportunity to leverage the Republican divide to achieve great things.  I hope she does.

Voter registration is said to be at an all-time high – around 200 million, however, that doesn’t mean everyone will vote.  If I were on the fence about voting for Clinton, or voting at all, I would need a good reason.  If you’re going to vote and know who you will vote for, post your thoughts about why, to help those who are on the fence make up their minds about which candidate can serve this country better.  Please post your opinion with kindness.


To post a political opinion or not…is that really the question?

By Andrew Shamrao

I’ve seen a few posts on Linkedin asking people to stop posting political messages.

One writer seemed to argue that politics doesn’t have anything to do with business, and therefore, does not belong in a professional networking forum, where business-related topics should be discussed.  Another writer argued that expressing political opinions may hurt one’s career.   He also argued that one test for determining if you should post your opinion is to ask yourself whether you really have something unique to say.  Both of these posts received many likes and a mixed bag of comments, some supportive of the author’s opinion, others against.

I find both of these points of view to favor discouraging free speech.  The view that one should only express oneself if you have something new or unique to say is the kind of thinking that stifles innovation.  Many would-be inventors don’t invent because they’ve been taught to think that someone has probably thought of their idea already.  In the same way many people don’t express their views because they think someone has already expressed what they’re thinking.  Who knows, perhaps one person’s unique expression of an idea that has been expressed by others will be better understood by some readers or listeners!  This should be reasons enough to encourage expression of all points of view.

As I was reading through some of the responses to the posts mentioned above, I began to wonder why in a country where free speech is valued, some would discourage it.  A moment later, I read a response to one of these posts that made it clear what people probably dislike most about online political exchanges.  The response was loud, not well thought through, insulting and had the quality of a rant.  The nature of the response made me want to close the forum and do something else.  Perhaps your reaction would have been similar.

In a recent post on LinkedIn, the founder of published her response to a writer who objected to forum participants who freely hurl insults in response to a post, without concern for whether they are addressing the point the writer is trying to make.  The founder’s response to the writer’s objections was to defend the individual who responded abusively, indicating that his responses garner an audience and that such responses are to be expected in a medium that allows one to express one’s opinions anonymously.  Her response disappointed and bothered me.

I’m a strong proponent of free speech, however, like many readers, I dislike uncivil dialogue.  I believe civil exchanges about any topic can be very enriching to writers, readers, speakers and listeners alike.  Civil exchanges need not be devoid of passion.  A point of view can be expressed passionately without using abusive and demeaning language.

While I dislike hearing abusive and demeaning language, I recognize that it’s not possible to stop someone from expressing themselves that way.  But I also know that the power in any exchange lies with the reader or listener, not the writer or speaker.  The reader or listener can choose not to respond to abusive rants.

We’ve probably all experienced people we don’t like to have conversations with.  We either try to avoid them, or don’t say much in response to their attempts to start a conversation.  The same actions are effective online, and in some ways easier to apply, because you can choose not to respond without feeling the discomfort you might feel if you were in front of the speaker and chose not to respond.

This simple idea that listeners and readers wield the power in their relationship with speakers and writers, respectively, is extremely powerful, because if applied effectively, it can extinguish the behavior of speaking or writing.  If, for example, a community of readers decides to ignore uncivil behavior in a forum, the experience of being ignored has the effect of eventually extinguishing the verbally abusive behavior in a forum member.  If no one is seemingly listening or reading the rants, why continue?   So it stops.

On the flip side, if someone who was using abusive language before happens to make a thoughtful response to a post, readers should reinforce that with acknowledgment and a thoughtful response in return.  This will result in better exchanges in the future, thereby, creating an environment for civil dialogue.  The community can shape the writing behavior of its members by choosing how to respond.

There was a time in my life when I was very argumentative in classes, anticipating what others would say and interrupting them to make my point.  My classmates began ignoring me when I tried to make a point.  Someone gave me the advice to be silent when another person is speaking, and pause for 3 seconds after they had finished talking, before responding to them.  When I practiced this, I discovered that the other person actually said something different than I had anticipated…and it was enlightening at times!

We live in an amazing country where free speech is enshrined in our constitution.  The responsibility of speakers and writers is to value that freedom of speech by giving others the right to their views without threat of being insulted.

I encourage civil exchanges on whatever topic individuals find relevant.  We do not experience life in a compartmentalized way in which there are hard walls that divide professional life from personal life, and business from politics and religion.  In every conversation, there is a possibility that one can and will learn something new.  Let’s all dare to converse and learn from each other…especially as we have an opportunity to influence each other in this election season.

The Constitution of the United States affords every one the right to free speech.  Let’s support our Constitution and encourage free expression, but use the power we have as listeners and readers to shape civility in writers and speakers.

Copyright 2016 by Andrew Shamrao, All Rights Reserved

Hillary Clinton Has An Opportunity To Lay The Foundation For Her Legacy Through Effective Change Leadership – Will She Take It?

In a previous article1, I alluded to the fact that Donald Trump does not deserves the presidency, because he is not capable of carrying out the most important responsibility of the President of the United States: To unite the country behind the cause of improving the Union, so that it continues to deliver to its citizens the promise of unalienable Rights, includig Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I believe Hillary Clinton has the potential to achieve her desired legacy if she takes advantage of a rare opportunity that Trump is unwittingly giving her.

Donald Trump cannot unite the leaders within his own party, let alone across party lines, and therefore, if elected, he will not be able to achieve much.  His bullying behavior creates only resentment in those who don’t support him, and his erratic nature and unfiltered opinions have alienated Republicans, to the point that some have decided to vote for Clinton.

The turmoil in the Republican Party presents a unique opportunity for Hillary Clinton to show Republicans that she can find common ground and work with them to bring about meaningful, positive change for all Americans.

Finding common ground is a prerequisite for achieving her goals as President, and thereby establishing her legacy.

All presidential candidates lay out the issues they are passionate about.  These issues are the basis of goals they hope to achieve while in the White House.  Hillary Clinton has followed suite with no less than 37 issues2, including a fair tax system, education and criminal justice reform. Clinton’s issues are broad enough that she can find common ground with Republicans about many of them.  The process for doing this can start now.

Clinton’s Opportunity to be a Change Leader

Demystifying Change Management3 presents four steps in the process of effective Change Management.  These are (1) Know your stakeholders, (2) Mind the gaps, (3) Close the gaps, and (4) Cross over to the future state.

Change Leadership for Clinton would involve working with her senior team to identifying key stakeholders for the high-level goals Clinton wants to achieve.  It would involve understanding the “alignment gaps” between stakeholders.  Alignment gaps indicate where leaders don’t agree.

Closing these gaps, or better yet, avoiding them altogether, would allow Democrats and Republicans together, under Clinton’s leadership, to clearly define goals that paint a vision of the future state.  The collaborative vision will motivate the nation and those who are charged with planning and acting to achieve the goals.  Together, they can help the nation cross over to the future state.

Identify and connect with key stakeholders

The groundwork for collaboration with Republicans can start now by identifying those members of Congress and Senate who are on the fence about supporting Trump and creating an “Influence Map.” The Influence Map visually connects stakeholders with others in their party over whom the stakeholder has influence.  The Influence Map should guide the strategy for meetings with Republican leaders.  It should also guide who among the Democratic leadership should meet with Republican stakeholders and convey to them Clinton’s sincere intent to collaborate to achieve great things for America.

Democratic leaders, like Nancy Pelosi, who presided over one of the most contentious political gridlocks in history, should not be among those who attempt to engage disaffected Republican leaders.  In fact, a new house Democratic leader is needed to initiate a collaborative future.  Nancy should gracefully step down and stand behind others in this effort to reach across the aisle.

Understand Alignment Gaps

Clinton’s 37 issues are a good start.  Under her leadership, the Clinton team should organize the issues from most likely to be supported by influential Republicans to least.  Because issues and high-level goals related to them are broad and do not contain the details of how they will be achieved, they are excellent fodder for conversation and for finding common ground.  If alignment is sought ahead of time by looking for compatible goals, initial meetings can be very successful in building rapport.

A common cause of rift and widening alignment gaps between parties is putting ideological bias ahead of the mission to do what is best for the country.  Politicians often lean on ideology when they want to oppose a solution from the opposing party, regardless of how effective the solution is likely to be.  Hence the need to understand common goals and to put a face on what achieving those goals will mean for people.

Premature discussions about the method by which goals will be achieved can result in people taking an ideological stance on the problem, resulting in roadblocks to discussing actionable steps.  Therefore, it is important to spend time appearing in front of each other’s constituents together, touting the importance of specific goals related to issues that mean something to people.  The activity of conversing about goals across party lines and engaging each other’s constituents in these conversations will set the stage for how goals can be achieved.

Alignment on goals is reached when the different parties not only agree about the value of pursuing those goals, but also agree that the search for methods of achieving the goals must be infused with more pragmatism and less ideology, where efficiency and effectiveness measures are the indicators of success.

Close the Gaps and Cross Over to the Future State

Even if there is agreement on goals, there are likely to be disagreements or alignment gaps on how to achieve those goals.  Who gets assigned to negotiate and participate in building the path to achieving a goal can spell success or ideological gridlock and therefore failure.  In the interest of collaboration, Clinton should propose that each party interview and select from the other party who they would want to be on the committee to create the plan to achieve a goal.  Reagan Democrats are likely to fare well with Republicans.  The Democratic leadership can be assured that if the Reagan democrats did not share their core beliefs, they would not call themselves Democrats.  Therefore, their selection should be encouraged and will help close the alignment gaps with Republicans.

Modeling and encouraging working together, freely recognizing Republican leaders for their support and contribution, and celebrating when agreements are reached will bring in an era of collaborative and successful government.

Ms. Clinton, your most recent mantra has the word “together” in it.  I’m not convinced you mean together with the Republicans.  The entire nation yearns for a government for the people – please, give it to us by working together with Republicans to make America great again!

Copyright 2016 by Andrew Shamrao, All Rights Reserved

1Why I believe Hillary Clinton should be the next American president – despite her questionable judgment and run-of-the-mill, election-year promises. By Andrew Shamrao, Published July 28, 2016,

2Hillary Clinton’s Goals

3Demystifying Change Management.  By Andrew Shamrao, Published June 16, 2016,



Why I believe Hillary Clinton should be the next American President – Despite her questionable judgment and run-of-the-mill, election-year promises

A few weeks ago, I posted a note on LinkedIn and Facebook asking whether people who disliked Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton would consider writing in Michael Bloomberg as an Independent candidate for President of the United States.

Since then I’ve answered this question for myself and evaluated why I think it’s worth voting for Hillary Clinton, despite her questionable judgment and run-of-the-mill, election-year promises.

My reasoning can be boiled down to one word: “Inclusion.”

Our Tendency to Exclude

History is replete with examples of people excluding individuals and groups based on their race, gender, caste or other social classification – things that people can’t change about themselves.  Being excluded from a clique, gang, fraternity, sorority, club, religion, school, political party or some other social organization limits what we can achieve.  From the standpoint of social evolution, humanity is still crawling its way towards inclusion as a way of being.

What stands in our way is our natural tendency to avoid and exclude the unfamiliar.  We fear what we don’t know or understand and therefore avoid or exclude it from our surroundings.  If exclusion comes naturally to us because of unfamiliarity, then to foster an inclusion mentality, we must initially create structures that force familiarity.  Humans have the unique ability to do this.

The United States, through its constitution and legal system, forced desegregation and made the presence of African Americans familiar in schools and thereby in a wide variety of professions over time, including politics.  The stage was set for the collective American psyche to accept that an African American could lead this country and to eventually prompt people to vote for Barak Obama to be president.

Barak Obama’s tenure as president has effectively shattered the glass ceiling for African Americans aspiring to attain the highest office in the country.  His tenure has also shattered any psychological barriers in the American psyche that questioned whether an African American could occupy the highest office.  Barak Obama’s presidency ushered in a new age of inclusion for African Americans who want to avail of any opportunity the United States of America has to offer.

The Foundation of Presidential Legacy

In the past eight years of Obama’s presidency, I’ve learned that without cooperation between parties in Congress the Senate and the Executive branch little of significance can happen for the people of the United States.  The burden on the president to find common ground and use it as the foundation for advancing an agenda is monumental.  History will be the final judge of Barak Obama’s success at fostering cooperation during his presidency.  Much of his legacy is at risk in the current election because he seemed unable to achieve common ground and thereby secure his achievements.

In the current election, we have a choice between two equally divisive individuals, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

On the most basic level, Donald Trump is a bully, not a leader.  To find evidence, you need only look at his demeaning treatment of his ally, New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie.  For all his accomplishments, Christie was reduced, in Trump’s presence, to a sidekick who needed to be told what to do and complied without question.  I imagine anyone demeaned by Trump through public comments and brushed aside for the next shiny object is reminded of painful events in the schoolyard when they were bullied and demeaned by a peer.

While Trump’s bully behavior with those close to him may yield compliance, if he’s elected, that same behavior with those outside his circle will generate resentment and resistance to his agenda.  His philosophy of exclusion will result in a regression of the American psyche to a less mature and evolved state.  Congress and the Senate will remain in gridlock if he is elected.  He will not be able to lead effectively because he will not be able to find common ground.  Therefore, he will not achieve his extremist agenda.

If Hillary Clinton is elected president, finding common ground with those in the opposite camp will seem like an insurmountable challenge.  All of her experience aside, not being able to inspire people from both parties to come together will be a threat to her legacy.

So why vote for Hillary Clinton?

I will vote for Hillary Clinton for the simple reason that she represents, for the American psyche, a significant, social, and evolutionary step towards greater inclusion.  She stands on the threshold of shattering the glass ceiling for women and my 9 year old daughter by being the first woman to be elected to the highest office of the United States. Most importantly, Hillary Clinton’s achievement will serve as nourishment for the germinating belief in my daughter’s psyche that she can achieve anything she wants to.

I want my daughter to spend the next four years seeing a woman lead this nation and learn through discussions with her parents and others what Clinton is doing well and how she might do things differently as she navigates, what, quite literally, still is a man’s world.  I want her to know that she, like Hillary Clinton, can overcome all social barriers to her pursuit of happiness.

Copyright 2016 by Andrew Shamrao, All rights reserved.